Architecture

You are currently browsing articles tagged Architecture.

We are very excited to begin a new project for the Sunset Hill neighborhood to transform an abandoned City Light substation parcel into a pocket park.  Based on the input from the community thus far, the program is very intriguing:  a community space with an artist-in-residence caretaker, powered by a serious photovoltaic array.

There may be more or different elements as the project evolves in the community design process, and as we navigate through various City agencies and funding sources, but fundamentally this has all the values we expound as a firm:  sustainable building, energized public space, housing options/density, and  an interactive process that invests people in the civic life of their neighborhood.

In 2008, I designed a structure with a similar program for a Dwell Magazine conceptual competition:

Crissy Field House

Crissy Field House

Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: , , , ,

alley

The big opening is tonight from 5 to 9, between 1st and 2nd just south of Pioneer Square–

Yesterday we hoisted the installation in place. While we still have to do lighting, the impact is great! From the end of the alley, the installation looks like a lonely cloud hovering there, and only once you get beneath it can you see the message “WASTE NOT.”

Tags: ,

alley installation--in process

alley installation--in process

We are working on a collaborative art installation for the Nord Building’s upcoming Alley Party, sponsored by two non-profits, Feet First and the International Sustainability Institute.

Feet First is an advocate for walkable communities, and ISI works on documenting global best practices for urban sustainability.  They have been working with their neighbors to transform alleys from nuisances to assets. Part of the program to invigorate the alleys as a vibrant urban places is their Alley Parties.  Each one incorporates art, music, food and drink to draw people into the alley and give people a different perspective on what they can become.

This Thursday, CAST, in collaboration with Christopher Ezzell of E Workshop, and Vashon Island artist Shahreyar Ataie,  will open an art installation that will float over their the Nord Building’s section of alley, using about 600 recycled 2 liter bottles.   It will be up through the New Year.

So come one and all!  Did I mention there will be food, drink and music?

Alley between 1st and Second, just South of Occidential Park

314 First Avenue

November 3rd,  from 5 pm to 9 pm

Tags: ,

IMG_3789-webCAST has been involved in a number of  pro bono projects over the years, such as parks, community gardenscommunity centersart installations, and smart development, and one of those, the Interbay P-Patch, is being published in an upcoming book on pro bono design by Public Architecture.

This project was originally headed up by Nathan Walker, and after he left town, we’ve continued our involvement, adding a kiosk, arbor and most recently cool signage at the street.

We’re really excited about the P-Patch, one, because it is a project that is near and dear to our hearts, and two, it can inspire more firms to offer their expertise to help civic and community causes, and more citizen groups to see that if they can dream it, they can build it.

Tags: , , ,

northwest perspective showing clerestory band wrapping studio and office

northwest perspective showing clerestory band wrapping studio and office

north elevation: office over guest suite to the left/studio to the right

north elevation: office over guest suite to the left/studio to the right

With the impending vote on the backyard cottage ordinance, everyone in the office has been doing a little daydreaming about the DADUs and what they would build.  I have been working on a idea that started with a little ink drawing. It’s now developed into a preliminary model/floor plans.  I’ve flipped the shed roof to have more volume in the shop/studio and worked out the bathroom so that my shop could easily be converted into an open kitchen/living space.

I have also been working out a simple steel structure, clad with structural insulated panels for easy construction and minimization of waste.  The goal is prefabrication of the components offsite, then assemble.

I’d love to try out using a geothermal pre-heating loop, with a hydronic radiant system run of a domestic hot water heater and test the new PV shingles, but that might get a bit expensive.

Tags: , ,

We’re almost there–the committee passed the measure to allow backyard cottages in Seattle.  Next stop will be City Council.

There are some notable amendments to the ordinance–the 50 per year allowed cap has been eliminated.  The heights have changed somewhat.  A discussion to limit the cottage height to no more than 15′ above the primary residence’s roof (which would affect sloped lots primarily) was tabled without conclusion.

The discussion is a little strange, in that some of the requirements being tossed around are more stringent than for building a single family house.  Case in point–if this relative height limit section passes, you will need a topographic survey to prove that the cottage conforms (not required on a new house if well within setbacks and under height), thus added about $2000 to the pricetag for the drawings.  This doesn’t make any sense if the city is serious about this as being an affortable option.

Another case in point–Councilmember Rasmussen was leaning toward a neighborhood notice, similar to a MUP, but the neighbor’s recourse, provided the cottage design fits the requirements, is nil.  The cottage is a Level 1 decision (no notice necessary, just like a new single family house), but creating such a provision would form a special class of notice (”Here is what is happening next door, but there is nothing you can do about it.  Thanks for coming down.”).

Unfortunately, I had to run out before the discussion on the privacy issue, another NIMBY favorite, but in the end the ordinance is one step closer to fruition.

You can see the entire meeting online at the Seattle Channel here.  Backyard Cottage discussion starts at 107.30.

Tags: , , ,

L3-max-front-NE-2

In the last month, the City Council paid 3 groups to study the new MF code and flesh out some likely outcomes (good and bad) and propose revisions to the code.  It is a complex issue–the code revision itself is about 277 pages–and no doubt the Council were daunted by the prospect of interpreting the impact.  It took me two evenings just to get through the entire code and I am still not sure I’ve got a handle on all the ins and outs.

The three groups were the Masterbuilders Association, the Congress of Residential Architects, and Group Three (composed of unaffiliated concerned citizens).  Each group were paid 5k for their work (our fee went to CORA–not to the  8 individual participants).  Here are my impressions from the three groups: Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: ,

CAST has been involved in reworking the Multi-family code for the City of Seattle–this byzantine, arcane legacy that seems to produce the dreaded Four Pack/Six Pack around a shared auto court.

The proposed code is evolutionary, and at this point, has been watered to down to the point that the impact will not affect the majority of lowrise multifamily that goes up in Seattle.  It is pretty disappointing in general, but a couple of highlights:

1. The move to FAR rather than density limits for number of unit will create more demand for smaller units in the L3 zone

2.  The setbacks are reduced–good for the urban sidewalk edge, and allow raised stoops in the front yard.

3. Height bonuses for workforce housing, and green building are going to get used–an example of incentivizing good construction.

And a couple of lowlights:

1.  Green Factor’s heart in is the right place, but the high baseline is going to force some heavy gaming of the rules, such as fences become ‘vegetated walls’, and green roofs are going to go in then be abandoned.  The city would be better off lowering the baseline and focusing it on green factors that are going to be maintained and become beneficial for the environment and the city.

2.  Density limits in L1 remain, and thus there is zero impetus to alter the 4 pack in any meaningful way.

3.  Partially below grade parking doesn’t count toward FAR (that’s good), but doesn’t give you additional height–meaning no one is going to pay to bury the parking if they are then also not able to offset the cost with a third story of marketable square footage.

I’ll post more info later….

Tags: ,

Here at CAST we have been watching the Seattle City Council very closely over the past few months as they contemplate passing an ordinance that would allow homeowners to construct backyard cottages, or DADUs (detached accessory dwelling units), on their property… The measure is of particular interest to me as I’m a proponent of multigenerational living. If passed, the ordinance would provide greater flexibility for Seattle homeowners who wish to bring their families closer together.

Curious what the ordinance would mean for my own property I spent a little time putting together some plans…

Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: , , , ,

We have been working hard to get the City of Seattle to agree to allow Backyard Cottages, or DADUs (detached accessory dwelling units).

It gives owners opportunity and choice to provide additional housing for rental or a studio, will increase property values and does so in a measured way that is conscientious of neighbors and the single family neighborhood fabric. The current legislation will allow fifty per year–so it will have a minimal effect on neighborhood character.  If anything, I’d like to see more of them.

I find it amazing that this is at all controversial, considering you can put an detached accessory building or garage on your lot which may not be as tall, but can take up to 1000 square feet of your back yard!   The argument that this proposal will lead to less trees and green space in Seattle is a red herring.

And since attached accessory dwellings are already allowed outright, it also doesn’t make sense that this proposal will lead to more density.  More likely, it will lead to more people choosing to build a small cottage than expanding their existing house to provide for the mother-in-law.  Two smaller structures are better for the scale of the city than more larger houses.

Carriage houses are successful component of many cities’ neighborhood fabric and we’d like to see them allowed in Seattle too!  If they were, I’d build one–my neighborhood and site would be perfect for a little cottage–so here is my first pass….

backyard_cottage

I need a shop space, my wife needs an home office, and both of us need a place for our parents when they are in town for extended visits.

The building’s footprint is roughly 40 x 14 with an airy studio (or 1 car garage with ample storage), and a guest bedroom and bath on the first floor.  Stairs lead up to a loft office overlooking the garden.  The design has some additional flexibility built in–the garage can be built with the rough in for a kitchen, so with minor changes, we’d have a 2br/1ba cottage.

We have been talking to an excellent local contractor with experience in prefab about teaming up to deliver a few prototypical designs for a fixed price (including ground work) somewhere around $210 a square foot, but one-off custom stick built cottages will be competitive in price, and adapt to the unique conditions of each site–existing lot coverage, location of existing buildings, solar orientation, parking, matching materials etc.

Before we do any real development, the City Council needs to green light the ordinance.  So you support the legislation, email the council!

Tags: , , , ,

« Older entries